Peer, you didn't say which program you are using for this? Polarrfn or Molrep? Do you get the same results with both programs? Also did you try sharpening the Fs with Ecalc and/or using all your data? In my experience sharpening works better with self- than with cross-rotation functions because the differences between NCS-related monomers are usually much less those than between non-isomorphous ones.
Cheers -- Ian On 29 April 2015 at 15:00, Peer Mittl <[email protected]> wrote: > Zbyszek Otwinowski and Fred Vellieux suggested to run the self-rotation > on Fcalcs. This suggestion "solved" the problem, since there are similar > peaks on the kappa=180° planes as well. However, I wasn't able to get rid > of those peaks by playing around with resolution and integration radius. I > must say that I am surprized, because - as Eleanor pointed out - I also > expected to find peaks on the kappa=180° planes only in case of P6522 > symmetry. Anyway, this experience reminds me to run some simple tests > beforehand. > -Peer > > > > On 29.04.2015 15:31, Eleanor Dodson wrote: > >> Well - PG P6/mmm (possible SG P6522) will have peaks at kappa = 180 >> omega = 90 phi = 0 30 60 etc.. >> >> But if there is only one molecule / asymm unit there cant be an extra >> 2-fold. >> >> How big are the relative domains? Your interesting domain couldnt just be >> cleaved off could it? >> Eleanor >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 12:59, Peer Mittl <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> We are working with a multi-domain protein crystallized in SG P6_5 >> with one molecule per asymmetric unit. The structure was refined >> at 2.00 A resolution with reasonable R-factors but unfortunately >> the domain we are most interested in seems to be disordered. >> Interestingly, the self-rotation function shows peaks on the >> kappa=180° plane (omega=90°, phi=19° (and every 30°)), with more >> than 50% origin peak height. Therefore, we are wondering if >> perhaps the space group assignment might be sub-optimal. Any >> explanations how these self-rotation peaks could occur and how we >> could extract meaningful information to resolve the disordered >> domain are welcome. >> >> Best regards, >> Peer >> >> P.S. Some additional information: pointless suggests SG P6_5, the >> data doesn't seem to be twinned (L-test), the refined part of the >> structure has no "internal symmetry" and refinement in P1 doesn't >> reveal the "lost" domain. >> >>
