Can't you break the ambiguity if there is significant anomalous signal? So, you'd need to have collected data from a protein crystal with SeMet, or a heavy atom, or near the S edge, and know the orientation of the crystal w.r.t. the direction of the unique crystal axis (for instance from face indexing.)
Sue Dr. Sue A. Roberts Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Arizona 1306 E. University Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85721 Phone: 520 621 4168 s...@email.arizona.edu -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Phil Jeffrey Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 12:24 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crystal habit/morphology and the relationship to unit cell contents I would have thought that what the indexing routine defined as [001] vs [00-1] would be essentially random as one would obtain the equivalent indexing in 622 in both "up" and "down" alignment of the crystallographic a/b/c axes with respect to crystal morphology. Phil Jeffrey Princeton On 6/1/15 1:44 PM, Scott Lovell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > If you have access to diffractometer equipped with a 4-circle goniometer, you > should be able to index the faces of the crystals. All you need to do is > collect some images to index the lattice and determine the orientation > matrix. Most instruments have software that allows one to then orient > specific faces or crystallographic directions relative to various directions > of the instrument (eg. camera, phi axis, direct beam, etc). So after > indexing, you could then orient the [001] direction of the crystal towards > the camera to determine if this is the "top" or the "base". You can also > determine the direction of the a/b axes [100] and [010] relative to the > crystal and index the other faces. If you can also measure the interfacial > angles, this may help you to confirm the indices. > > If you do this for a number of samples, is the "top" face always the [001] > direction or is it the [00-1] direction for other crystals? Assuming that > you are growing these crystals by hanging drop, my guess is that the "base" > is in contact with the coverslip during growth and you observe this half > pyramid habit. If you were to grow the crystals using the floating drop > method, to prevent contact with the plate materials, would the crystals form > a bipyramidal habit? Or do you see crystals in the current drop that have > the same habit but are not in contact with the plate materials? > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of > Paul Paukstelis > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 11:21 AM > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: [ccp4bb] crystal habit/morphology and the relationship to > unit cell contents > > I'm interested in knowing how to figure out the relationship between the unit > cell contents and the crystal habit in these crystals (small attachment, two > roughly orthogonal views). > > Space group is P64 (enantiomeric) , and you can clearly see the six-fold. The > question becomes how to determine which direction the screw axis is going > with respect to "top" and the "base" of the pyramidal crystals (right image) > so I can gauge how/why the crystals grow this way based on the cell contents. > > Thanks in advance. > > --paul >
