Dear all

I am trying to solve a structure using Fe SAD collected with mini-kappa from 
several non-isomorphic crystals (following on from the previous thread 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1608&L=CCP4BB&D=0&P=35088). 
Xtriage suggests weak anomalous signal to 4 A.

For the SHELX pipeline using hkl2map, are there any metrics/numbers that I can 
use to judge the quality of each dataset? For example, what should be the value 
of CCall/CCweak to decide between strong/promising and useless cases?

Is there any difference between using CRANK2 and hkl2map, considering that the 
underlying software are the same?

Will the wavy Rmerge affect the 'solvability'?

Thanks.
Mohamed

Reply via email to