Hi Tommi,
Could it be the bug that was reported in June?
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1606&L=ccp4bb&F=&S=&P=119181
Obviously if you recently updated XDS is can't be that.
HTH,
Folmer
On 2016-10-21 18:00, Kajander, Tommi A wrote:
Problem solved, or well, circumvented - for the record: This seems to
happen during XDSCONV indeed (F2MTZ seems to dump half the reflections?)
and running via aimless seems to work. Either there is a bug with the
conversion in the SG or I made some mistake (which i cant quite
figure out now).
Thanks for comments!
Tommi
On Oct 21, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Kajander, Tommi A
<tommi.kajan...@helsinki.fi <mailto:tommi.kajan...@helsinki.fi>> wrote:
Hi,
This seems very stupid but I have some data sets processed with XDS
with apparently close to 100% completeness (high symmetry F4132)
only 50 (or 100) degrees of data, fine, but still looks complete
overall, given the high symmetry, though low res could be better.
After running it via XDSCONV to truncate for a check, or to phenix -
I get a completeness of ca. 50% for the Fs…
… cant quite figure out where this is coming from…? Never happened
before. Too tired now. Any suggestions?
Tommi
