Dear Pavel,

I believe words have a meaning, but they are not defined. This may make 
languages a little more demanding than mathematics, since you have to deal 
with a variety of a few hundred thousand to millions, depending how popular 
the language in question is, but personally I enjoy the challenge.

W.r.t. the thread, 3.8A resolution is poorer than 1.8A. I understand this is 
what John meant to clarify.

Best,
Tim

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 11:12:10 AM CET Pavel Afonine wrote:
> Hi Tim, hi Natesh,
> 
> one expression is mathematically, the other one is technically 'more
> 
> > correct'.
> > I favour the terms poor and good resolution to avoid confusion, or
> > explicitly
> > list the values.
> 
> just out of curiosity.. what's your definition of 'poor' and 'good'
> resolutions? I suspect there are as many definitions as many subscribers to
> this list are -;)
> 
> One way to quantify resolution is that what kind of detail you can see in
> the map, like for example:
> 
> - deformation density (~0.7A and higher) = ultra-high, sub-atomic,
> sub-Angstrom;
> - H atoms (~0.9A and higher) = not sure what the name is;
> - individual non-H atoms (~1.2A and higher) = atomic;
> - hole in rings (~2A and higher?) = high;
> - medium;
> - still can see side chains (up to 4.5A);
> - no side-chains but SS elements (such as tubes of density for helices) =
> low
> - no SS, molecular envelopes = very low.
> 
> Note, resolution alone is not a good measure though. Data completeness is
> similarly important, e.g. a map corresponding to 2A resolution may look
> like a 3ish A resolution if you miss some low-resolution data or
> high-resolution end is severely incomplete (Acta Cryst. (2014). D70,
> 2593-2606).
> 
> Low resolution  --> worse than 2.7 A
> 
> > Ultra high resolution --> better than 0.95 A
> 
> Looking into this in some systematic way one can define low-resolution as
> 6A and lower, and ultra-high resolution as 0.7A and higher (Page 1291: Acta
> Cryst. (2009). D65, 1283–1291).
> 
> All the best,
> Pavel

-- 
--
Paul Scherrer Institut
Tim Gruene
- persoenlich -
OFLC/102
CH-5232 Villigen PSI
phone: +41 (0)56 310 5297

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to