Hi, The old approach of counting the number of clashes was changed to the percentage of trace atoms (typically CA atoms) involved in clashes largely because, as people like Eleanor pointed out to us, the number of clashes grows with the size of the problem and solutions can be rejected when the fraction of the structure involved in clashes is still very small. The default now is to accept up to 10% of the trace atoms being involved in clashes. So increasing that to a larger number should have the same basic effect as increasing the number of allowed clashes did in the old version.
If you want to get sophisticated, there's even another new feature, where you can use the ENSEMBLE…TRACE command to define a TRACE molecule. That will be carried along with the actual search model and used to check for clashes. This might be useful if, for instance, you think a domain might change conformation slightly so you don't want it in the search model, but you want to exclude solutions that would create clashes with that domain. Best wishes, Randy Read > On 17 Feb 2017, at 08:28, Xiao Lei <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear CCP4bb members, > > I found in the newer CCP4 Phaser MR version (I use CCP4 7.0.0 in Win7), there > is no "allow maximal clash..." option anymore. There are only two options > "pairwise percent packing" and "accept all solutions". I used to increase > the number in the "allow maximal clash" (let's say from 100 to 200) to do MR > and this works fine in a couple of cases. > > With the new Phaser version, I could not do this anymore, can I understand > that I just need to increase the pairwise percent packing cutoff (let's say > from 5% to 10%) to loose the tight packing criteria and allow more clashes in > finding solutions? > > ------ Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: + 44 1223 336500 Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Fax: + 44 1223 336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
