Relevant to this discussion, the 2018 ACA meeting in Toronto will have a 
session on

"Best practices for building, refining, and analyzing ligands in macromolecular 
structures”

co-chaired by Anna Gardberg and Kurt Krause.

I expect this session will include case studies of structures that went wrong 
as a way of educating the community about the potential pitfalls of building 
ligands into electron density.


John J. Tanner
Professor of Biochemistry and Chemistry
Chair, Biochemistry Department Graduate Admissions Committee
Department of Biochemistry
University of Missouri-Columbia
117 Schweitzer Hall
Columbia, MO 65211
Phone: 573-884-1280
Fax: 573-882-5635
Email: tanne...@missouri.edu<mailto:tanne...@missouri.edu>
http://faculty.missouri.edu/~tannerjj/tannergroup/tanner.html
Lab: Schlundt Annex rooms 3,6,9, 203B, 203C
Office: Schlundt Annex 203A



On Jun 27, 2017, at 1:34 AM, Trevor Sewell 
<trevor.sew...@uct.ac.za<mailto:trevor.sew...@uct.ac.za>> wrote:


I have come across a key paper in my field that describes an enzyme mechanism. 
Their work is based on a deposited structure – by other authors - that is 
incorrectly interpreted.

Is there a process for removing a demonstrably wrong structure (deposited by 
others) from the PDB and replacing it with a correctly interpreted structure 
based on the original data? Or is there an alternative, and generally 
recognized, way of getting the correct structure in the public domain?

Many thanks for your advice on this matter.

Trevor Sewell

Disclaimer - University of Cape Town This e-mail is subject to UCT policies and 
e-mail disclaimer published on our website at 
http://www.uct.ac.za/about/policies/emaildisclaimer/ or obtainable from +27 21 
650 9111. If this e-mail is not related to the business of UCT, it is sent by 
the sender in an individual capacity. Please report security incidents or abuse 
via cs...@uct.ac.za<mailto:cs...@uct.ac.za>

Reply via email to