That is right. I had the data already and did not want to throw it away.

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Eleanor Dodson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I think you need to worry about why that has happened, rather than get an
> automated rejection criteria!
> There must be some problem in the data collection for that to happen..
>
> Eleanor
>
> On 9 November 2017 at 19:04, CPMAS Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is there a way to reject diffraction images based on Rmerge?
>>
>> When I processed my data with XDS, I use AIMLESS in CCP4 to get merged,
>> truncated data. However, there is quite some images with high Rmerge, say
>> larger than 1. Is there a keyword I can use to reject these images based a
>> Rmerge cut-off, say 0.6?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Charles
>>
>> --
>>
>> ***************************************************
>>
>> Charles Chen, Ph. D
>>
>> Research Associate
>>
>> University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
>>
>> Department of Anesthesiology
>>
>> ******************************************************
>>
>>
>


-- 

***************************************************

Charles Chen

Research Associate

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Department of Anesthesiology

******************************************************

Reply via email to