X-ray spectroscopy. If you took the data at a sync. source there is possibly equipment for it built into the beam line. On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 05:01 LEGRAND Pierre < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Due to the absorbed X-ray dose and photoreduction process during > datacollection, it is most probably Fe+2. See for example: > J Biol Chem <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617268/#>. > 2013 Apr 5; 288(14): 9648–9661. > doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.438796 > <https://dx.doi.org/10.1074%2Fjbc.M112.438796> > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617268/ > > Bests, > Pierre Legrand > PROXIMA-1 synchrotron-SOLEIL > > ------------------------------ > *De :* CCP4 bulletin board [[email protected]] de la part de rohit > kumar [[email protected]] > *Envoyé :* vendredi 5 janvier 2018 11:45 > *À :* [email protected] > *Objet :* [ccp4bb] Iron Oxidising state > > Dear All, > > I am solving a structure (resolution 2 A) of an enzyme having Iron as > a metal cofactor. > > How could I know oxidising state of the bound Iron (Fe+2 or Fe+3)? > > > Thank you in advance > > > -- > WITH REGARDS > Dr. Rohit Kumar Singh > >
