Dear Vandna,

Paired refinement is indeed the most reliable way to see whether the higher 
resolution data help your refinement. It is done automatically on the 
pdb-redo.eu server if the resolution of the data used in refinement so far is 
lower than the resolution of your dataset (by at least 0.1A). We get the 
resolution from your REMARK 3 stuff in the input pdb file header.
Although it is not an ideal experiment, you can also cheat pdb-redo into doing 
paired refinement by forging the header of your pdb file.

HTH,
Robbie

Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: Graeme Winter<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
Sent: maandag 12 februari 2018 20:48
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution cut off

The most useful information for this can come from paired refinement, which 
will tell you if the data in outer shell is improving the model.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689524/

For example

On balance it’s unlikely throwing away measurements will make your model 
better...

Best wishes Graeme
________________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Vands 
[vanx...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2018 19:27
To: ccp4bb
Subject: [ccp4bb] Resolution cut off

Hi,
       I solved a crystal structure at 1.69 A resolution with R /R free  18 / 
20 i used 1.69 A data.

Data completeness is 100 % and for the outer shell, it's 50 %. for i /Sig I > 1.

Do I need to cut resolution in refinement??

Vandna Kukshal
Postdoctral Research Associate
Dept. Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid, Campus Box 8231
St. Louis, MO 63110
--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments 
are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you 
may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with 
the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

Reply via email to