Usual recommendations are to have CC-half > 0.3 or 0.5 (these are usually not 
so far separated)

For the most part the refinement software is smart enough to down-weight 
“noise” in the outer shell so there is very little penalty in including weak 
measurements, and you should put up a fight with reviewers who complain about 
the Rmerge in the outer shell! Paired refinement is a good metric for 
determining if the new measurements add anything

You could probably go a little further than you have, since the outer shell is 
also complete which suggests you have not hit detector limit…

best wishes Graeme

On 5 Jun 2018, at 10:29, Deepali Verma 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Dear all,

I am trying to process a crystal data at 2.8Å and having CC1/2 is 0.771 (outer 
shell). I just want to know the acceptable range of CC1/2. These are the 
statistics of the process data.



                                           Overall  InnerShell  OuterShell

  Low resolution limit                       74.67     74.67      2.95

  High resolution limit                       2.80      8.85      2.80


  Rmerge                                     0.067     0.042     0.964

  Rmerge in top intensity bin                0.043        -         -

  Rmeas (within I+/I-)                       0.072     0.046     1.032

  Rmeas (all I+ & I-)                        0.072     0.046     1.032

  Rpim (within I+/I-)                        0.026     0.018     0.368

  Rpim (all I+ & I-)                         0.026     0.018     0.368

  Fractional partial bias                   -0.025    -0.019    -0.071

  Total number of observations              289022      8892     42020

  Total number unique                        37156      1218      5376

  Mean((I)/sd(I))                             16.5      39.0       2.1

  Mn(I) half-set correlation CC(1/2)         0.999     0.998     0.771

  Completeness                                99.3      98.7      99.0

  Multiplicity                                 7.8       7.3       7.8


  Anomalous completeness                      99.3      98.5      98.9

  Anomalous multiplicity                       4.0       3.9       4.0

  DelAnom correlation between half-sets     -0.042    -0.036     0.015

  Mid-Slope of Anom Normal Probability       0.937       -         -

--
Regards,
Deepali Verma
Junior Research Fellow
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology
[http://ampmfacilityservices.com/assets/Uploads/image001-1.gif]

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


-- 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. 
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments 
are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you 
may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with 
the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to