Dear all, Thank you very much for all of your suggestions and sharing experiences. As many of you commented, the current small unit cell C2 refinement seems to be incorrect or correct, and I should put some efforts to crack this question.
- To Phill Jeffrey, The idea, trying to find high symmetry SG with small unit cell C2 data is good idea, and I will try this. For your last comments, identifiable electron density differences between each chain, I guess there should not be other densities between chains if my current SG and model is correct. Am I right? - To Ethan, Turning off the automatic_tNCS_option seems to be good option. I think, my current data seems to be twinned then tNCS which I am not sure at this moment. But I will keep your advice in my mind. - To Phoebe A. Rice, It is quite interesting that you also could get structure solution by indexing strong spots and having smaller unit cell. Actually, I was wondering how it was possible that having half-sized unit cell could have solution, while full-sized unit cell could not. It will be great if you can share your experience a bit more (e.g the size of smaller unit cell used in initial search for both 1szp and 3pkz) Again, thank you very much for all of your suggestion. Best wishes, Donghyuk ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
