Hi Jakob,
If there is radiation damage, for every "new" positive density there should
be a negative density in the original position. From the pictures we've
seen, it seems unlikely.
Best,
Nukri

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:21 AM Keller, Jacob <[email protected]>
wrote:

> How about radiation-damaged/smashed Sulphur? You could test this by
> refining occupancy of the cys S.
>
>
>
> JPK
>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Jacob Pearson Keller
>
> Research Scientist / Looger Lab
>
> HHMI Janelia Research Campus
>
> 19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147
>
> Desk: (571)209-4000 x3159
>
> Cell: (301)592-7004
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
> The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient
> specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of
> this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender.
> If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and
> follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not
> occur in the future.
>
>
>
> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> * On Behalf Of *Lumbini
> Yadav
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:12 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Fo-Fc density close to cysteine residue
>
>
>
> Thank you for the valuable input
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:25 PM Eleanor Dodson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Well - that more or less proves the residue is a CYS - there is a peak in
> the PHAN map right on the S.
>
> And that the extra density does not contain an anomalous scatterer so is
> probably not a metal or a sulphate or...
>
>
>
> But that still doesnt explain WHAT it is . Sorry not to be more help..
>
>
>
> Eleanor
>
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 11:32, Lumbini Yadav <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> No I am using ccp4i. I tried doing SAD refinement in refmac and the output
> image is attached below .
>
> I do not seen density near cysteine that was visible in Fo-Fc map
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:40 PM Eleanor Dodson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> The key word for refmac is ANOM MAPONLY
>
> Are you using GUI2?
>
> Eleanor
>
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 09:32, Lumbini Yadav <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have soaked my crystals in  sodium dithionite a reducing agent. I have
> not done mass spec but sequence is confirmed
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:26 PM Bonsor, Daniel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Have you mass-speced the protein before crystallization to make sure it
> wasn’t derivatized during expression and/or purification, or compared the
> mass spec of the crystals verses purified protein? Any fancy reagents or
> other reductants used during purification?
>
> What about S-Acetyl-cysteine (3-letter code: SCY).
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> Daniel A Bonsor PhD.
>
> Sundberg Lab
>
> Institute of Human Virology
>
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
>
> 725 W Lombard Street N370
>
> Baltimore
>
> Maryland
>
> MD 21201
>
> Tel: (410) 706-7457
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of 
> *Lumbini
> Yadav
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 09, 2019 5:22 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Fo-Fc density close to cysteine residue
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> We have found a huge Fo-Fc density close to cysteine residue (see attached
> image) in the structure with resolution of 1.2A. In the crystallization
> condition, we have PEG 3350, Potassium phosphate monobasic, glycerol and
> protein was in Tris and NaCl. Before freezing the crystals were soaked in
> mother liquor containing sodium dithionite.
>
>
>
> I have tried different modified cysteine (CSX, CSO, OCS, CME, CSS, SNC, CSD,
> CXM, SCH, CSU) from the library and also SO3, SO2 and peroxide. But in
> all the screenings we do see some part of Fo-Fc density unaddressed at 3
> sigma.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have an idea about what this density could be? Covalent
> modification?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Lumbini
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=LU6cRtx0xgB8s29tIz9Olw&r=eLCg9eJ4Rs_LnxfUWsp7FSxhIEcZYmTSU4Uyq1bRYPI&m=Z963G6bopP8xJVXD1Wuy672eSOZyBi1ySdwyyfyUY28&s=eacDldZlgDNyZ5rJs_4-dTAl4HGX6sPpzGppOB85YNk&e=>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=LU6cRtx0xgB8s29tIz9Olw&r=eLCg9eJ4Rs_LnxfUWsp7FSxhIEcZYmTSU4Uyq1bRYPI&m=Z963G6bopP8xJVXD1Wuy672eSOZyBi1ySdwyyfyUY28&s=eacDldZlgDNyZ5rJs_4-dTAl4HGX6sPpzGppOB85YNk&e=>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=LU6cRtx0xgB8s29tIz9Olw&r=eLCg9eJ4Rs_LnxfUWsp7FSxhIEcZYmTSU4Uyq1bRYPI&m=Z963G6bopP8xJVXD1Wuy672eSOZyBi1ySdwyyfyUY28&s=eacDldZlgDNyZ5rJs_4-dTAl4HGX6sPpzGppOB85YNk&e=>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to