Agreed. I support green new deal and I think we should be doing all we can to 
combat climate change,
not because I have studied it and concluded it is a problem but because some 
very smart people have, and have come to that conclusion. But I would not sign 
a letter saying that I have concluded, AS A SCIENTIST, that it is a problem we 
can do something about. That turns a scientific investigation into a popularity 
contest. I don't want to be one the 97% that Peter Mueller is talking about in 
his response (currently second in the list, I think) to:
https://www.quora.com/It-is-claimed-that-97-of-climate-scientists-state-that-anthropogenic-climate-change-is-real-What-evidence-do-the-3-who-dont-think-so-have-What-are-some-good-counterarguments-to-their-claims

On 08/20/2019 09:23 PM, Daniel M. Himmel, Ph. D. wrote:
Dear colleagues,

Since when does being a structural biologist make us experts in climatology,

and isn't it a breach of basic ethical practice and professionalism as 
scientists

to sign on as authors to an article for which we have neither contributed

research nor intellectual content of the manuscript?  Are we now going against

the standard to which the editorial policies of leading reputable biological

journals normally hold us as authors?  And doesn't it hurt the credibility

of a serious scientific article, its authors, and the journal in which it 
appears

if biologists with no expertise in earth science/astrophysics appear

without humility as authors to such an article?

Are you not embarrassed to put your name to an article that uses physical

sciences data as a platform for preaching about religion, politics, and economic

theory ("...social and economic justice for all...")?

Does it not upset you when someone unfamiliar with structural biology draws

firm conclusions that heavily depend on the part of a structural model that has 
high

B-factors?  So why are you unconcerned that you may be guilty of an analogous

error when, as structural biologists, you put your name to a controversial 
interpretation

of selected earth science data?  See, for example,

https://blogs.agu.org/geospace/2017/02/24/living-warm-peak-ice-ages/ 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.agu.org_geospace_2017_02_24_living-2Dwarm-2Dpeak-2Dice-2Dages_&d=DwMFaQ&c=ogn2iPkgF7TkVSicOVBfKg&r=cFgyH4s-peZ6Pfyh0zB379rxK2XG5oHu7VblrALfYPA&m=LfePZHA4gOg8bnjmaYKYkoqTIFbSh_3nRLCNhk-sURs&s=2kt0JhKFcXo_sdWpN2wW87x3uPKaKcXgcHX6UNJoNgw&e=>
 about the ways

climate data can be misinterpreted by choosing too tight a time interval, and 
lets stick to

structural biology and allied sciences in the CCP4 list, please.

Respectfully,

Daniel M. Himmel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=ogn2iPkgF7TkVSicOVBfKg&r=cFgyH4s-peZ6Pfyh0zB379rxK2XG5oHu7VblrALfYPA&m=LfePZHA4gOg8bnjmaYKYkoqTIFbSh_3nRLCNhk-sURs&s=AJzjWPMkl7UZhaac4xpovzF6xye63SAMi-VYc_-rbdg&e=>


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to