Dear Paul,
Sorry to re-open old thread (staycatation...)

glad for you listening to the feedback - much appreciated.

> I think the situation has arisen because Coot users are bringing previous
> experience of using RSR into their
> use of 0.9. Because the movement of the non-dragged atoms in 0.8.x was
> rather unsophisticated, many people
> learnt (I discovered, rather late in the day) to "flick" the dragged atom
> with a large and fast movement to
> get over a local energy barrier. (Needless to say, I hadn't intended for

This +1 (everyone using coot, that I know does it)



> For myself, by using eigen-flip and jiggle fit beforehand and then by
> combining pepflip, JED Flip and
> backrub rotamer during RSR I often don't even need to pull on the atoms. By


Do you mean in the new version: instead of simple "drag - large and
fast movement to  get over a local energy barrier" - you recommend to
do this above multiple steps? Sadly, it would be a great decrease in
usability.

Best regards,
Vero

PS: I still have not used the new version.




> adding in interactive contact
> dots, I can see what it is that's causing Coot to not move the atom to where
> I'm trying to drag it (the NBCs
> have been re-paramaterized and up-weighted in the 0.9.x rewrite). I have,
> from time to time in the past
> year, used Coot 0.8.x and to me it now feels painfully crippled. RSR in Coot
> 0.9.x is joyfully expeditious
> and pleasingly animated.
>
> For now (which is to say, before Coot 0.9.1 is available) I suggest keeping
> an eye out for unsatisfied atom
> pull restraints, and using the "Clear Pull Restraints" at moments of
> confusion. Also, use less flick and
> more smoothness when dragging atoms. For example, a 180 degree rotation of
> the ribose from the Coot tutorial
> would be difficult, if not impossible using 0.8.x, but in 0.9.x one can pull
> on the hydrogen atom of the O5'
> to rotate it in a few seconds. I have added a (rather poor) video of me
> doing just that to my channel (I
> should make a better video).
>
> With all that said, I am still listening - I will add a change shortly that
> will make the pull atom
> restraints more obvious by making them fatter, pinker and more opaque. If
> there are still problems and you
> could somehow make a screencast available to me that illustrates the
> problem, then I would be very
> interested to view it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul.
>
>
> On 04/09/2020 10:05, Schreuder, Herman /DE wrote:
>> Dear Paul,
>>
>> Here I fully agree with Eike. With the real space refinement in the new
>> coot the ligand often goes
>> everywhere, except where it should go. Changing the Xray weight helps
>> sometimes, but not always. In many
>> cases I do not real-space refine and leave it to Buster to do the
>> refinement. It would be very good if the
>> old behavior could be reinstalled.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Herman
>>
>> *Von:*CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> *Im Auftrag von *Schulz,
>> Eike-Christian
>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 4. September 2020 10:36
>> *An:* [email protected]
>> *Betreff:* [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] Going back to Coot 0.8
>>
>> *EXTERNAL : *Real sender is [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>> Dear Paul,
>>
>> I have been working with coot for over 10 years now with little reason to
>> complain.
>>
>> However, in spite of trying for a few months now, I am not getting warm
>> with coot 0.9.
>>
>> I like the new eye-candy, and the more organized menus. But fitting
>> residues and ligands into ED, has never
>> before been so difficult, and frankly it annoys me that previously simple
>> tasks have become an effort. It
>> seems as if coot and I see different minima and we always disagree where
>> to put the residue. At the moment
>> all my data are at convenient resolutions of 1.7Å or better, so there is
>> little ambiguity on that side.
>>
>> I am using all default settings, but maybe there is something that needs
>> to be changed?
>>
>>   * Is there a way to go back to the old (0.8-style) fitting functions in
>> coot 0.9? If so how?
>>   * If not, which of the last coot versions
>>
>> (https://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/personal/pemsley/coot/binaries/release/
>>
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www2.mrc-2Dlmb.cam.ac.uk_personal_pemsley_coot_binaries_release_&d=DwMGaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=3AflakQZ5Fz_M9sPnssJL3oU4C-u25224gN5ljs5KwA&s=_vveOeCJ42OXDKFFrxFP_yaBEA0xSQBIGW2RWy8kmAk&e=>)
>>     would you recommend?
>>
>> With best regards,
>>
>> Eike
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_WA-2DJISC.exe-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMGaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=3AflakQZ5Fz_M9sPnssJL3oU4C-u25224gN5ljs5KwA&s=75WQhZGYOtd4zWRp-4QbaftNeHjcD7TdnUNJCeafm8o&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>>
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing
> list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to