Thanks for sending the logs

Looking at the output the negative R values don’t come from xia2 directly

For AUTOMATIC/DEFAULT/NATIVE                 Overall    Low     High
High resolution limit                           1.01    2.74    1.01
Low resolution limit                           36.95   36.97    1.03
Completeness                                   68.6    72.2    16.3
Multiplicity                                    3.4     4.0     1.1
I/sigma                                         6.8    11.0     0.6
Rmerge(I)                                     0.127   0.131   1.543
Rmerge(I+/-)                                  0.121   0.127   1.173
Rmeas(I)                                      0.141   0.147   2.162
Rmeas(I+/-)                                   0.145   0.151   1.659
Rpim(I)                                       0.059   0.062   1.512
Rpim(I+/-)                                    0.078   0.079   1.173
CC half                                       0.985   0.971   0.149
Wilson B factor                              11.910
Anomalous completeness                         45.7    57.6     1.8
Anomalous multiplicity                          2.1     2.5     1.0
Anomalous correlation                        -0.106  -0.135   0.000
Anomalous slope                               0.921
dF/F                                          0.079
dI/s(dI)                                      0.699
Total observations                           143283    9600     559
Total unique                                  41851    2397     494
Assuming spacegroup: P 41 21 2
Other likely alternatives are:
P 43 21 2
Unit cell:
 78.580  78.580  36.950
 90.000  90.000  90.000

While a 1990’s reviewer would have a hard time with those merging stats, I have 
seen worse and they seem internally consistent

I wonder, is ccp4i2 doing something itself which arrives at those numbers?

i2 devs - thoughts?

Thanks Graeme

On 1 Jul 2021, at 05:49, Winter, Graeme (DLSLtd,RAL,LSCI) 
<graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>> wrote:

Something odd happening there - please could you send the text log off list? 
i.e. xia2.txt

Thanks Graeme

On 1 Jul 2021, at 00:58, Murpholino Peligro 
<murpholi...@gmail.com<mailto:murpholi...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Why Rmeas is negative in DIALS output?


Thanks


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

<Screenshot from 2021-06-30 18-46-10.png>



--

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments 
are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you 
may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with 
the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to