Yes, I should have mentioned the truncation by estimated RMS error, which was part of the protocol we used in the paper with David Baker’s group. The error estimates are calibrated, I believe, for just the C-alpha atoms, so they are probably generally underestimates of the errors in the rest of the atoms in a residue, particularly the side chains; otherwise, the atom weighting obtained by converting the error estimate into an equivalent B-factor would be enough to account for errors.
Randy > On 3 Jul 2021, at 17:36, Adam Simpkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that RoseTTAFold would be a good idea! We've been looking at the > models for MR recently and in many cases they're excellent. We've found it > can be useful to truncate the models based on the predicted rms errors with > AMPLE (clearer solutions or even the difference between success & failure) so > this might be a useful strategy to consider if the models don't work in MR by > themselves. > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 > > This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing > list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ ----- Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500 The Keith Peters Building Fax: +44 1223 336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
