Sorry I got confused with the wrong labeling. But the stoichiometry issue and 
poor expression is still the main problem. As Tom suggested, you should try to 
improve the expression. Poor expression often results in impurities 
copurifying. Also, if the interaction is not tight, why are you co-expressing? 
Unless coexpression is helping in some way (solubility ....) you are better off 
expressing (and purifying) them separately and then mixing them. often, when 
you co-express multiple proteins, you get poor expression as well.


Dhiraj
________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Tom Huxford 
<thuxf...@sdsu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 11:27 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: [External] Re: [ccp4bb] 60 kDa contamination in Rosetta cells

I agree with Dhiraj' suggestion that the 60 kDa is not your biggest concern.  
Optimize soluble protein expression and pay attention to cell lysis.  Is the 
sample remaining cold throughout the process?  Are you using enough volume of 
buffer relative to solid cell pellet?

Also, from the gel it does not look like your 37 and 15 kDa bands are 
co-eluting.  And your lane labels in the figure are not right.

Good news:  this seems like a solvable problem.  Keep after it!

Tom Huxford.

==============
Tom Huxford
Structural Biochemistry Laboratory
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry
San Diego State University
(619) 594-1606

On Jul 13, 2021, at 5:22 AM, Dilip Badgujar 
<dilip....@gmail.com<mailto:dilip....@gmail.com>> wrote:


Hello,

Please find the attached gel picture for the reference and some additional 
information.

Lysis buffer-50 mM Tris-pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT. 1X protease inhibitor 
cocktail.

SEC column – Superdex 200. 16/300

One of the proteins is 37 kDa while the other one is15 kDa. I do not think that 
they are making that strong heterodimer. The total molecular of the complex 
would be ~ 52 kDa but now it is around 60 kDa. I am currently using lower 
temperature (16 ᵒC) but can try around 12 with low IPTG conc.

Regards

Dilip Badgujar

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:56 PM zaigham khan 
<mahmood.zaig...@gmail.com<mailto:mahmood.zaig...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hey Dilip,

There are many reasons for this observation. Rafael is right, please do share 
the image of the gel. Also what are the exact sizes of the two proteins that 
you co-expressed? I have observed the heterodimeric and pentameric proteins on 
SDS-PAGE albeit the presence of DTT in the sample buffer, and despite boiling 
of the samples. Could this be that 60 KD is actually the hetero-dimer? One can 
perform western blotting, followed by the use of anti-polyhistidine and 
anti-Streptavidin antibodies on separate blots to confirm the suspected bands. 
Likewise SEC followed by WB may confirm the identity of the eluted proteins in 
different fractions after size exclusion chromatography. You may also cleave 
the tags, and then see the magic!

Tom has correctly pointed out that induction at lower temperature is best 
achieved upon incubation of culture so that the temperature is dropped before 
the induction.

Bon Voyage!

-Z


Zaigham M Khan, PhD
Associate Scientist

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Department of Oncological Sciences
1470 Madison Avenue
New York
United States


On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:45 AM Dilip Badgujar 
<dilip....@gmail.com<mailto:dilip....@gmail.com>> wrote:
Greetings, everyone

I am trying to co-express two mammalian proteins (less than 50 kDa MW) in 
Rosetta cells but getting a contaminating band around 60 kDa. One of the 
construct is in pET28a with His tag while the other is in pET21c with Strep tag 
and I am adding all the three selection markers during growth of pre-culture 
and during induction. Initially, cells were grown at 37 °C till OD reaches to 
0.6 then induced with 0.5mM IPTG and incubated at 16°C ON. When I do 
purification using Streptactin resin; I can see proteins of my interest bound 
to the resin along with contaminating protein at 60 kDa. I have tried 
performing size exclusion as a follow up step but they are co-eluting in void 
volume. I have also tried to wash with MgCL2-ATP solution but it co-elution 
with contaminant. I am looking for valuable suggestions to avoid the 
contamination during or after expression.

Thanks in advance.

Regards

Dilip

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


--
Dilip C. Badgujar, (PhD)
Post Doctoral Fellow,
IIT Bomaby


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

<Purification-Attempt1.png>


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to