Hey everyone, Thanks for all the suggestions there are a few different things I can try now. The data is very aniosotropic (STARANISO might help) in regards to how the crystal diffracts and I think changing the bin size will help specifically with PAIREF (its an warning so it completes the run). I collected the data using oil and at room temperature using a vector scan so there are also differences in data quality through the collection (not too severe based on data processing), radiation damage, a changing background from oil, etc.
However, diagnosing the problem further it seems that merging with AIMLESS throws a lot of my high resolution reflections out...like alot. This explains why truncating the data doesnt change the maps and explains why my table 1 statistics for high resolution bin are dismal. I can supply log files when I find them. Now I have to determine if the outlier rejections are useful or not and why DIALS processing didn't flag these as rejections. I have yet to look into AIMLESS rejection outlier protocol but I would guess that the reflections are real at high resolution but there are not that many of them and they are not that redundant and therefore are being tossed. Matt ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
