My suspicions were raised when a post by James to this BB didn't run to several 
pages...

Harry
--
Dr Harry Powell

> On 1 Apr 2023, at 08:14, Eleanor Dodson 
> <0000176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Ha ha!
> 
>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 05:34, James Holton <jmhol...@lbl.gov> wrote:
>> Anyone who has ever had to lecture a student for writing their unit cell 
>> lengths to dozens of decimal places is going to love the new PDB 
>> format.  It is more compact, more realistic, and less misleading to the 
>> poor, downstream consumers of structural data.
>> 
>> Only a few structures in the PDB are better than 1.0 A, and none come 
>> even close to 0.1 A.  Nevertheless, the classic PDB file format always 
>> listed atomic coordinates to three decimal places!  That's implying a 
>> precision of 0.001 A, which is not supported by the resolution of the 
>> data.  At long last, this age-old error is being corrected.  From now 
>> on, coordinates will be listed to the nearest Angstrom only.
>> 
>> An unexpected consequence of this is that R-free of a typical structure 
>> is going to rise from the current ~20% to well into the 40%s.  This is, 
>> however, more consistent with high-impact structures published in 
>> big-named journals using modern, better data collection methods like 
>> XFELs and CryoEM, so we are going to call this an improvement.  Besides, 
>> R factors are just cosmetic anyway.
>> 
>> Updated molprobity scores are not yet available while the authors fix 
>> bugs in their programs.  Right now, they return errors with the new, 
>> improved coordinates, such as:
>> line 272: 57012 Segmentation fault      (core dumped)
>> 
>> So, just as we all must adapt to Python 3 this new standard I'm sure 
>> will earn us all the thanks of future generations. They will no doubt be 
>> very grateful that we took these pains to protect them from the dangers 
>> of too many decimal places.
>> 
>> -James Holton
>> MAD Scientist
>> 
>> ########################################################################
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>> 
>> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing 
>> list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to