Did you make the original deposition ? If so the pdb accepts re-depositions...
If it was done by someone else I guess the courteous thing is to notify them and maybe talk to the pdb- redo team? Cheers Eleanor On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 01:53, Lucas Souza <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > After auditing and reprocessing a deposited structure with clear > processing mistakes (missing/wrong residues and ligands with evident > density) prior to some analysis that are going to be published, what should > be done? Re-deposit the structure with a "reprocess" flag? Reopen the PDB > deposition and update the files? Or simply state in the publication that > the data was reprocessed? > > I'm curious if there's a consensus on handling situations of this nature. > > Cheers, > Lucas > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 > > This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a > mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are > available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
