Hi Matt,

I appreciate disagreement and comments from colleagues. My two cents are that 
it seems unnecessary to repeat scaling and merging, or any earlier step. If you 
want to remove structure factor amplitudes or merged intensities from the MTZ 
file you can do so using MTZUTILS or similar functionality in CCP4 
(https://www.ccp4.ac.uk/html/mtzutils.html#generalresolution). For refinement, 
you can specify the desired resolution range in your favorite refinement 
program.

My personal convention is to use CC1/2 = 0.30 as the point to which retain data 
and <I/sigI> = 2 as the nominal resolution of the dataset. If you have the 
HKL2000 scaling log, you should be able to retrieve this information. I frankly 
wish we’d just deposit all data in the PDB rather than truncate based on some 
criterion or another.

Best, Doeke

From: Matt Mcleod <mjmcleo...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 4:12 PM
To: Hekstra, Doeke Romke <doeke_heks...@harvard.edu>
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rescale merged data?

Sure thing.

A former student left somewhere between 30-50 datasets but they scaled the data 
to the detector corners (or maybe edge) in HKL2000.  There are many of the 
high-resolution bins with no reflections in them.  He then went forward and 
merged this data, presumably in HKL2000 again and did his model 
building/refinement.   We now need to re-refine the models against this data 
for publication but we need a more suitable resolution cutoff for the data.

Rather than go back and index/integrate all the data and then rescale the data 
to a more appropriate place (then merge), I was wondering if there was a way to 
take the merged reflections as either .sca or .mtz (from scalepacktomtz output) 
and then rescale to a more appropriate resolution.  It doesn't seem like the 
student left unmerged data.

So, nothing fancy (aniostropy etc), there is just a lot of data that needs to 
be adjusted and I am trying to avoid reprocessing all the frames again.

Matt

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 15:59, Hekstra, Doeke Romke 
<doeke_heks...@harvard.edu<mailto:doeke_heks...@harvard.edu>> wrote:
Hi Matt,

It would be helpful if you could describe your case in more detail. Do you want 
to change the resolution cutoff after scaling? Do you want to keep more data? 
Fewer? Or do you mean something different such as truncation to generate 
amplitudes, application of anisotropic resolution cutoffs,  or outlier 
rejection? Are you referring to data that were scaled in HKL2000?

Best, Doeke

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>> 
On Behalf Of Matt McLeod
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 3:04 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: [ccp4bb] Rescale merged data?

Hi all,

I am looking at a old students data and it looks like they didn't properly cut 
off the data during scaling.  All of the files I have appear to be the merged 
.sca (or mtz after converting with scalepacktomtz) - is there a way to 
retruncate the data after merging or do I have to reprocess the data?

Thanks,

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_WA-2DJISC.exe-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=DPfbtiuJFZDsaMqRC3wABRuP0iJZMKOIsdAAHocfxcg&m=hJXGz_3_uI3SAKeW8GEqSK_1Qr5wKgBiSnbDjVjBNhSVakQOsdVMVRRe_MBbhJ4L&s=4rZTwcJhEjd1bJl5IPP_Hx0Y_vlFww2ZSsUH0nDMTQE&e=>

This message was issued to members of 
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_CCP4BB&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=DPfbtiuJFZDsaMqRC3wABRuP0iJZMKOIsdAAHocfxcg&m=hJXGz_3_uI3SAKeW8GEqSK_1Qr5wKgBiSnbDjVjBNhSVakQOsdVMVRRe_MBbhJ4L&s=Q9SS6-TevYcWhuxShDbUJofSUXOmTisCs4Ri8YccEHw&e=>,
 a mailing list hosted by 
www.jiscmail.ac.uk<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=DPfbtiuJFZDsaMqRC3wABRuP0iJZMKOIsdAAHocfxcg&m=hJXGz_3_uI3SAKeW8GEqSK_1Qr5wKgBiSnbDjVjBNhSVakQOsdVMVRRe_MBbhJ4L&s=9Jze4xWSveGay7htjcwemmwFSwvtjCqm1SvXSmmr3g4&e=>,
 terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_policyandsecurity_&d=DwMFaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=DPfbtiuJFZDsaMqRC3wABRuP0iJZMKOIsdAAHocfxcg&m=hJXGz_3_uI3SAKeW8GEqSK_1Qr5wKgBiSnbDjVjBNhSVakQOsdVMVRRe_MBbhJ4L&s=SlvCI5t8-1t-4jbVfCyG2ENCo3VDDqOQbYElsa7eHKc&e=>


--
Matthew Jordan McLeod, PhD
Post-Doctoral Fellow - Cornell University



########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to