But are there two conformations of the disulphide? or one disulphide and
one broken link?
Eleaor

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 20:42, Dr. Kevin M Jude <kj...@stanford.edu> wrote:

> I have done this in shelxl or phenix refinement, you can define occupancy
> groups (or free variables in shelxl) so that 472A and 384A are one group,
> 472B and 384B are another. Pretty sure there is a similar solution in
> refmac. Though also if the 384A rotamer doesn’t clash with the 472B
> rotamer, you could have three states A/A (disulfide), A/B (no disulfide),
> B/B (no disulfide).
>
>
>
> --
>
> Kevin Jude, PhD
>
> Structural Biology Research Specialist, Garcia Lab
>
> Howard Hughes Medical Institute
>
> Stanford University School of Medicine
>
> Beckman B177, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford CA 94305
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Liliana
> Margent <lmarg...@gradcenter.cuny.edu>
> *Date: *Monday, May 6, 2024 at 12:20 PM
> *To: *CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> *Subject: *[ccp4bb] Modeling Disulfide Bond Occupancies
>
> Greetings everyone,
>
> I'm currently in the process of modeling a disulfide bond in two
> structures. However, when I attempt to model single occupancy for the
> cysteines involved in the bond, negative density blobs emerge within the
> disulfide bond. This suggests the possibility of alternate conformations
> for the cysteines.
>
> Yet, when I endeavor to model alternate conformations for both cysteines,
> their occupancies do not align despite running refinement with a bond
> parameter file that specifies the link. To illustrate, I initiate the
> refinement with occupancies for Cys472 as A0.75/B0.25 and for C384 as
> A0.75/B0.25, but post-refinement, the output occupancies appear as Cys472
> A0.84/B0.16 and for C384 A0.97/B0.03. Where A confs participate in the s-s
> bond.
>
> Has anyone else encountered this issue before, or does anyone have
> suggestions on how to refine these cysteines to achieve coherent
> occupancies?
>
> Thank you for any insights you can provide.
>
> Best,
> Liliana
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
> mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
> available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to