Hi Eleanor,
 
I had basically the same question that I asked in phenixbb recently, the answer 
was also that the reason for red blobs is the solvent mask. In phenix there is 
mosaic modelling available that deals with the red blobs:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pro.4909

Best,
Andrea



On Friday, July 26, 2024 09:27 CEST, David Briggs <[email protected]> 
wrote:

 Hi Eleanor,
 My understanding about negative holes in difference maps is that it is down to 
incorrectly modelled bulk solvent. I have seen this in structures where there 
are voids inside a protein that are perhaps in reality empty, but get modelled 
as bulk solvent, and so you get a negative difference peak filling the void.
 I am more than happy to be corrected, though.
 Best,
 Dave
 
--
Dr David C. Briggs CSci MRSB (he/him)
Principal Laboratory Research Scientist
Signalling and Structural Biology Lab
The Francis Crick Institute
London, UK
Working hours: Mon-Fri 0900-1700
==
about.me/david_briggs | OrcID | Google Scholar  
______________________________________________________________________________

From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> on behalf of Eleanor Dodson 
<[email protected]>
Sent: 25 July 2024 07:10
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Presence of negative density in Sim Omit map External 
Sender: Use caution.
Hmm - I cant quite understand your map - that density is not for the lysine ? 
It looks like a well ordered PHE contoured at quite a high level?As Edward 
suggests - if you omit a well ordered feature the resultant difference maps 
often show high positive density and a surrounding complementary "sag" of 
negative density - not really something to worry about..But I wonder why you 
don't just do a bog standard difference map? Set the occupancies of the loop 
you want to omit to 0.00 - do a few cycles of refinement and see what comes 
back? A prediction - the well ordered features will show up loud and clear and 
your surface LYS wont! High resolution structures show they often are in 
multiple conformations, which would be hard to model at 2.1A. 
 And just a thought about negative features in difference maps. I often see 
random "holes" which don't seem to have any logical explanation.. I sloppily 
put them down to "data defects - missing data? poorly measured data? etc - but 
does anyone have a more satisfactory explanation?Or dont other people see 
them??Eleanor

 On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 01:48, Edward A. Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
 
Does your difference map have mean value ~zero (over 1 ASU or cell)? If maps 
are constructed by 
Fourier transform without the 0 0 0 reflection, they have mean of zero (because 
the mean of a 
sinusoid over one period is zero).  That means that any time you add positive 
(difference) density, 
which raises the mean value of the absolute map, the Fourier map has to sink 
down a little to bring 
that new mean value to zero.
Now if your data were complete except for the 0 0 0 reflection, this would move 
the floor down 
everywhere by a small amount to balance the large increase at the local peak, 
and it would not go 
below the negative contour limit. But without the ultra-low resolution 
amplitudes the FT cannot make 
a constant offset, and instead you get sagging around the peak, like a 
water-bed sagging around the 
spot where a child (the peak) is standing. This could lead to the sagging part 
going below the 
negative contour and giving you the red density.
However I would not have expected the negative density to be quite so localized 
around the peak - 
depending on your low-res cutoff. As John Bacik suggested you should check for 
a mis-modeled part of 
a symm-related molecule, but if that were the case, you should see the red 
density even before 
omitting the loop, and you should see the red density somewhere else on your 
model. If it just 
appeared after omitting the loop, it could be due to the map sagging under the 
weight of the peak, 
and should go away as soon as the residue is replaced.
eab

Renuka Kadirvelraj wrote:
> Hi CCP4bb,
> We would greatly appreciate your advice regarding an odd problem that has 
> cropped up with one of our 
> crystal structures. We have a protein structure in space group P6(3)22 at 2.1 
> A resolution and in 
> the final refinement stages with Rwork of 0.20 and Rfree of 0.22. When we ran 
> simulated annealing to 
> rebuild an outlier Lysine residue in a loop (using Phenix), the Sim Omit map 
> showed the positive 
> density expected from the omission of the loop (colored green in attached 
> pics). However, flanking 
> the positive density, there is a complimentary negative density (in red). We 
> are puzzled as to the 
> cause of the appearance of the negative density. Can you help us?
> Many thanks,
> Renu
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> Renu Kadirvelraj, Ph.D.
> Research Scientist
> A428, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
> 120, East Green Street
> University of Georgia
> Athens, GA 30602
> Tel: (706) 583 0303
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
 

______________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
The Francis Crick Institute Limited is a registered charity in England and 
Wales no. 1140062 and a company registered in England and Wales no. 06885462, 
with its registered office at 1 Midland Road London NW1 1AT

______________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to