I read somewhere (I don’t have the ref, sorry) that it is because the phases 
are directly measured in cryoEM (since it is an imaging technique), and they 
are often more accurate than the phases of crystallographic maps.

On this basis, if you can find a structure that has been solved both by cryoEM 
and crystallography with very accurate experimental phasing, and at comparable 
resolutions, then these two maps should look more similar in quality than what 
you would observe when comparing the same cryoEM map to a crystallographic map 
phased by MR.

Cheers,

Guillaume


On 26 Sep 2024, at 18:56, Jon Cooper 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:


Another thing I am curious about is how a map can look good at 5.5 sigma 
because an X-ray one probably wouldn't unless it was atomic resolution. Don't 
worry if there isn't a simple explanation.

Best wishes, Jon Cooper.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Sent from Proton Mail Android


-------- Original Message --------
On 26/09/2024 11:13, anna anna wrote:
Dear all,
I am depositing my first cryoEM structure and I am facing the following problem 
concerning the contour level of the map.

Briefly, where do I find the value for the contour level to associate to the 
uploaded map in Coot?

Long story: I worked with coot and I am happy with my map when I set the 
contour level at 0.115 V = 5.5 rmsd (actually "happy" is not the best 
definition, I feel quite uncomfortable with this "by feeling" assignment but, 
to what I understood, this is how it works...).
Upon deposition, when I upload maps, a contour level is required but the values 
from coot are not accepted, I have to provide the contour level relative to the 
map value, like the one that you set in Chimera. Thus I opened the map in 
Chimera and I set a contour level "by eye" but the validation report revealed 
some problems: the total volume of the map is too low and too many residues are 
highlighted as out of density. Probably I should low the contour level but I 
don't want to go for a trial-and-error approach, there must be a way to convert 
the contour level from coot (the one that I used for modelling) in the one 
required for deposition!

Any advice?

Thank you,
Anna

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


VARNING: Klicka inte på länkar och öppna inte bilagor om du inte känner igen 
avsändaren och vet att innehållet är säkert.
CAUTION: Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognise the 
sender and know the content is safe.










När du har kontakt med oss på Uppsala universitet med e-post så innebär det att 
vi behandlar dina personuppgifter. För att läsa mer om hur vi gör det kan du 
läsa här: http://www.uu.se/om-uu/dataskydd-personuppgifter/

E-mailing Uppsala University means that we will process your personal data. For 
more information on how this is performed, please read here: 
http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to