Hi. When in doubt, reprocess in P1.  That has cleared things up on more than 
one occasion.

Ala

Ala M Shaqra, Ph.D., M.B.A.
Senior Research Scientist and Laboratory Manager
Director, Crystallography and Structure Based Drug Design Core Facility
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
364 Plantation St. LRB 970C
Worcester MA 01605-4321
Ph: (508) 856-2636  Fax: (508) 856-6215
Email: ala.sha...@umassmed.edu<mailto:ala.sha...@umassmed.edu>
website: https://www.umassmed.edu/schifferlab/

From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Eleanor Dodson 
<0000176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Date: Friday, July 11, 2025 at 7:05 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] smaller cell volume for accommodating protein complex & 
no MR solution even very similar template
You are quite right - 90+120 residues will not fit in a cell of   38.221   
38.221  196.300  90.00  90.00 120.00 or
   38.221   38.221  149.000  90.00  90.00 120.00 with symmetry P 6  2 2 .
So either the cell is wrong, the symmetry is wrong, or the protein is not as 
you thought..
There is no point trying MR searches till that is sorted..

First suspicious feature. The cell should not change with a different 
oscillation angle..I think you need to re-examine the data processing carefully
and try to understand why the c axis is different..
Then of course spacegroups can be in error
If you attach your data processing logs they might provide a clue..

On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 10:30, 陈成 
<0001179598b916c0-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:0001179598b916c0-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>>
 wrote:
Dear CCP4BB people,

  I have been working on several data sets collected from crystals grown in 
co-crystallization trials containing a small molecule and Calprotectin, a 
heterologous protein dimer comprised of two polypeptides with around 90 and 120 
amino acids respectively. The crystallographic structure of Calprotectin 
complexed with a 18-aa peptide have been deposited in RCSB database under PDB 
entry 7QUV, with cell parameters a = b = 50.8, c = 148.8 in the P 32 2 1 space 
group. On the contrast, the bunches of data sets I collected give cell 
parameters  a = b = 38.3, c = 196.3 in the P 6 2 2 space group when an 
oscilliation angle of 0.5 degree was used or cell parameters  a = b = 38.2, c = 
149.0 in the P 6 2 2 space group when an oscilliation angle of 0.2 degree was 
used. In either cases, Matthews_coef analysis would suggest that the crystal 
cell cannot accommodate the whole Calprotectin complex. I had used each single 
protein of Calprotectin as the search template for MR, but failed as well. 
Though Phenix.xtriage suggest nothing wrong with the data sets, however, 
considering that the two polypeptide conprising Calprotectin is structurally 
similar, I had also tried indexing the data sets under space group spanning P2, 
P3 apart from P622 and then run MR by a thorough combination of each data sets 
and different template choices, which, in opposition to what was expected, 
still gave no reliable MR solution. It's noteworthy that the diffraction 
pattern of my crytals seemingly showed that multi-crystal problem or other 
intrinsic growth defects might be underconsidered.

  In fact, I've been encountering the above crystallographic situation for 3 
times recently, which all bear the following characteristics:
  (1) cell volume is far smaller than expected for containing targeted 
macromolecules (protein/DNA) that is used for crystallization.
  (2) no MR solution is achieved though MR template is extremely and sometimes 
100% similar.
  (3) growth defects such as multi-crystal or fibrous diffraction problems 
possibly exist.

  Hopefully someone may have dealt with such issues before. Any suggestions is 
welcomed!

  Sincerely
  Chen


Cheng Chen, Associate Professor
School of Life Sciences, Building 15, Tianjin University
No.92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to