Dear community members, 

I recently received a different opinion regarding whether one sample should be 
C121 or I121.

I am trying to integrate automatic data processing and displaying resutls to 
users. In the pipeline, I run pointless to get the best space group solution, 
in the end of this message comes the detailed pointless output related to space 
group determination that I got for one of the samples. I took the best solution 
from pointless, i.e. I121  (Cell:    81.74   67.10   86.75      90.00   98.20   
90.00). However, I later also extracted the space group and unit cell result 
from the phenix.xtriage output and got C121  (Cell: 110.377 67.1 81.744 90 
128.931 90). The space group number indicates space group 5 from both cases, 
and according to the International Tables for Crystallography Volume A: 
Space-group symmetry Second online edition (2016) [ISBN: 978-0-470-97423-0 
(https://it.iucr.org/services/purchase/)[doi: 
10.1107/97809553602060000114](http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000114), 
space group 5 should be C121. 

Could I receive some wisdom from the community regarding whether one is 
correct, and if so, which one, or whether both are correct? Any further 
comments/opinion regarding whether I should display both options (I121 and C121 
with their corresponding unit cell parameters) would be helpful.

Thank you so much in advance!

Best,
Dawn

pointless output:
<!--SUMMARY_BEGIN-->

Input file is merged so subgroups of the input symmetry are omitted
   Only groups of the same or higher symmetry are kept
WARNING: very low completeness   0.38 in merged file, may not be able to 
determine Laue group


   Laue Group        Lklhd   NetZc  Zc+   Zc-    CC    CC-  Rmeas   R-  Delta 
ReindexOperator

= 1  I 1 2/m 1  ***  1.000   8.53  8.53  0.00   0.85  0.00   0.07  0.00   0.0 
[-l,k,h+l]


<!--SUMMARY_END-->

********************************************************

Testing Lauegroups for systematic absences
------------------------------------------

No systematic absence zones to test in this lattice group

Time for systematic absence tests:    0.053 secs


Possible spacegroups:
--------------------
Indistinguishable space groups are grouped together on successive lines
'Reindex' is the operator to convert from the input hklin frame to the standard 
spacegroup frame.
'TotProb' is a total probability estimate (unnormalised)
'SysAbsProb' is an estimate of the probability of the space group based on
the observed systematic absences.
'Conditions' are the reflection conditions (absences)
   Spacegroup         TotProb SysAbsProb     Reindex         Conditions

       I 1 2 1 (  5)    1.000  1.000        [-l,k,h+l]


---------------------------------------------------------------


Space group confidence (= Sqrt(Score * (Score - NextBestScore))) =     1.00
Laue group confidence  (= Sqrt(Score * (Score - NextBestScore))) =     1.00
Selecting space group I 1 2 1 as there is a single space group with the highest 
score
<!--SUMMARY_BEGIN--> $TEXT:Result: $$ $$
Best Solution:    space group I 1 2 1
   Reindex operator:                  [-l,k,h+l]
   Laue group probability:             1.000
   Systematic absence probability:     1.000
   Total probability:                  1.000
   Space group confidence:             1.000
   Laue group confidence               1.000

   Unit cell:    81.74   67.10   86.75      90.00   98.20   90.00
$$ <!--SUMMARY_END-->
HKLIN spacegroup: C 1 2 1  C-centred monoclinic
The input crystal system is C-centred monoclinic
 (Cell:   110.38   67.10   81.74      90.00  128.93   90.00)
The crystal system chosen for output is body-centred monoclinic
 (Cell:    81.74   67.10   86.75      90.00   98.20   90.00)

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to