Cheers Harry I actually found the notes!
Best wishes, Jon Cooper. [email protected] Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for Android. -------- Original Message -------- On Tuesday, 12/09/25 at 21:46 CCP4BB <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jon > > This may jog your memory - > > https://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/mosflm/mosflm/dataproc-tutorial.html#mosflm_strategy > > Harry > > On 9 Dec 2025, at 17:40, Jon Cooper > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, mosflm will do that if you run it in the command line but I can't >> remember the commands, sorry. I have my 30+ YO notes somewhere though. The >> completeness will be relative to the asymmetric unit of reciprocal space >> rather than a full sphere of reflections. >> >> Best wishes, Jon Cooper. [email protected] >> >> Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for Android. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> On Tuesday, 12/09/25 at 16:54 Alaa Shaikhqasem >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear CCP4BB community, >>> >>> I have collected several partial rotation wedges from the same crystal, and >>> each wedge was processed separately in XDS. From each processing run, I >>> know the experimental completeness (i.e., the fraction of reflections >>> actually observed). >>> >>> I would like to determine the theoretical/predicted completeness for each >>> wedge, meaning: how many reflections should be measurable from that >>> specific rotation range, given the crystal symmetry and geometry, >>> regardless of whether they were actually observed. >>> >>> Specifically: >>> >>> - >>> >>> Is there a way in XDS to compute the expected number of reflections for an >>> arbitrary rotation range (e.g., from angle X° to Y°)? >>> >>> - >>> >>> Can XDS output the theoretical completeness of such a wedge relative to a >>> full 360° dataset? >>> >>> - >>> >>> If not directly available in XDS, what tools or workflow would you >>> recommend to calculate this? >>> >>> My goal is to compare the experimental completeness per wedge with the >>> predicted completeness of that same wedge, to understand how much coverage >>> is intrinsically possible from that rotation interval. >>> >>> Any suggestions, especially for doing this within XDS or with related >>> tools, would be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> Alaa >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: >>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: >> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
