Dear All,
IMHO, this Is a subtle example of Hypnocracy.
Doriano

[cid:7cc37a75-f8a6-4639-bfb7-50c7c7fffbc9]
[facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/CNRsocialFB> [twitter] 
<https://twitter.com/CNRsocial_>  [instagram] 
<https://www.instagram.com/cnrsocial/>  [linkedin] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/283032>
Dott. Doriano Lamba
Istituto di Cristallografia
Trieste Outstation
Retired Senior Associate Fellow
ORCID: 0000-0001-6859-7868
WoS Research ID: B-2961-2011
Cell.: 330 411 796
WhastApp: 329 261 6908
https://www.ic.cnr.it
E-Mail: [email protected]
Area Science Park - Basovizza,
S.S. n°14, Km 163.5
I-34149 – Trieste
www.cnr.it<http://www.cnr.it/>
Devolvi il 5×1000 al CNR
CF 80054330586


________________________________
Da: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> per conto di Kikuti Carlos 
<[email protected]>
Inviato: giovedì 4 giugno 2026 09:10
A: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Oggetto: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic question: apparent verbatim plagiarism


Marian,



Maybe they are using your and other articles to fish for "clients" – people who 
will submit manuscripts using the @gmail.com address in the fake journal 
website? With the aim to make the clients pay for publication? I haven't tried, 
to be honest, just a suspicion.



Anyways, plagiarism is bad, no matter the aim, so thank you for warning 
everyone. This concerns us all, and it is too easy to copy and fake stuff these 
days. Makes me wonder why it hasn't happened before – if it hasn't.



If someone finds a solution for this kind of situation, please keep us posted.



(+ I agree with Paola, and those are very frequent first and last names in 
Brazil)



Suerte,



---------------------------------------------------
Carlos KIKUTI, PhD

Structural Motility Team
UMR144 - CNRS - Institut Curie

12 rue Lhomond - 75005 Paris, France
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>







De : CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> au nom de Marian Oliva 
<[email protected]>
Répondre à : Marian Oliva <[email protected]>
Date : jeudi 4 juin 2026 à 08:16
À : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Objet : Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic question: apparent verbatim plagiarism



Dear colleagues,



Thank you all very much for your helpful suggestions, comments, and for taking 
the time to look into this matter.



Following your advice, we have already contacted the Editor of the Journal of 
Medicinal Chemistry, since ACS owns the copyright of the original article and 
may have experience dealing with similar situations. We have also informed the 
Ethics Committee of our institute and are preparing a report for PubPeer so 
that the case is publicly documented.



The comments pointing to the possibility that this may not be an isolated 
incident are particularly concerning. The example provided by Gareth strongly 
suggests that other articles in the same volume have also been copied verbatim 
from legitimate publications. This indicates that the problem extends far 
beyond a single case and may affect a large number of researchers, 
institutions, and publishers who are completely unaware that their work has 
been duplicated.



I also found Pascale observation especially intriguing. If this is indeed a 
fake journal mimicking the identity of a legitimate one, I struggle to 
understand the purpose behind creating such a website and populating it with 
plagiarized content. What is the end goal? Generating web traffic? Advertising 
revenue? Creating the appearance of a legitimate journal for some later 
purpose? At the moment, the whole operation seems difficult to comprehend.



In our case, we only became aware of the problem thanks to the librarians at 
our institute, who systematically monitor publications associated with our 
researchers and maintain our institutional databases. Without their vigilance, 
we would almost certainly never have discovered the duplicate publication. If, 
as suggested by the example identified by Gareth, multiple papers within the 
same volume are plagiarized, then there may be a very large number of affected 
authors who remain completely unaware that their work has been copied.



The entire situation is quite extraordinary and, frankly, rather alarming.



Thank you again for all your advice and support.



Best,

Marian



Marian Oliva

Unit for Biological, Immunological, and Chemical Drug Development

Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas

CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS

+34 918669485

[email protected]

C/ Ramiro de Maeztu, 9. 28040-Madrid



**NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD** Este correo electrónico, y en su caso los ficheros 
adjuntos, pueden contener información protegida para el uso exclusivo de su 
destinatario. Se prohíbe la distribución, reproducción o cualquier otro tipo de 
transmisión por parte de otra persona que no sea el destinatario. Si usted 
recibe por error este correo, se ruega comunicarlo al remitente y borrar el 
mensaje recibido.

**CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This email communication and any attachments may 
contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the 
designated recipient named above. Distribution, reproduction or any other use 
of this transmission by any party other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and 
delete all copies.









El 3 jun 2026, a las 14:14, MARCHOT Pascale 
<[email protected]> escribió:





Hello all,



This so-called "Journal of Research in Health Sciences" is a fake.

DOI: 10.31472/JRHS.2024.2.3 is not found in PubMed

And have a look at the funny titles of, e.g., Vol 18, Issue 1 (2026)...



The "real" one (with PMID, PMCID, DOI) is here: https://jrhs.umsha.ac.ir/



Best - PM





________________________________

De : CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> de la part de Hall, Gareth 
A.F. (Dr.) <[email protected]>
Envoyé : mercredi 3 juin 2026 14:01
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic question: apparent verbatim plagiarism



Ce mail provient de l'extérieur, restons vigilants

I have had a look at another article from the Journal of Research in Health 
Sciences using the same volume (16) and issue number (2) as that highlighted by 
Marian, and it is the same story. The paper by Rejc, et al. has been copied 
verbatim:



Effects of Oral Iododiflunisal on Hippocampal Amyloid-β Formation in a 
Transgenic Alzheimer’s Mouse Model: A Longitudinal Imaging Study

Dr. Haruto Sato, Dr. Yuki Tanaka, Dr. Rina Kobayashi, Dr. Kenji Nakamura, Dr. 
Aoi Yamamoto, Dr. Daichi Fujimoto (2024)



DOI: 
10.31472/JRHS.2024.2.2<https://jrhsjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/Vol16I2-2.pdf>





Oral treatment with iododiflunisal delays beta amyloid plaque formation in a 
transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer Disease: a Longitudinal in vivo molecular 
imaging study

L. Rejc, at al. (2020)

doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.23011/v1<https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.23011/v1>







Dr. Gareth Hall BSc MSc PhD FHEA

Associate Professor

Leicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology

Division of Molecular and Cell Biology

School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

College of Life Sciences

Henry Wellcome Building

University of Leicester | Lancaster Road | Leicester | LE1 7RH | UK

t: +44 (0)116 229 7418<tel:+441162297418>

e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

w: www.le.ac.uk<http://www.le.ac.uk/>


Follow us on Twitter<https://twitter.com/uniofleicester> or visit our 
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/uniofleicester> page

<image001.jpg>

From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> on behalf of Paola 
Lanzoni-Mangutchi <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, 3 June 2026 at 12:45
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic question: apparent verbatim plagiarism

You don't often get email from [email protected]. 
Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>

***CAUTION:*** This email was sent from an EXTERNAL source. Think before 
clicking links or opening attachments.

Hi Marian,



I'm sorry that you and your group have been targeted by such ridiculous 
misconduct. The papers are literally a copy of each other - and you can tell 
which one is the original by the resolution of the figures!



Being Brazilian myself, I find it very odd that the authors' names are composed 
of a single name and a single surname. The institutions' addresses are also 
suspiciously incomplete - I believe people would indicate their affiliation 
along the lines "Hospital de Clinicas, Department of XYZ, Faculty of Medical 
Sciences, Unicamp" for instance. Putting together the vary suspicious over 
simplicity of the names and the over simplicity of their institutions, I find 
it hard to even track who the authors could be - making me believe that someone 
trying to take advantage from this paper probably failed even at this sphere.



I am quite sure that all institutions mentioned: USP, UNICAMP and UFRJ have a 
research integrity office and you should get in touch with them. However, at 
this level, PubPeer seems to be a good option as well.



I am also wondering if the other papers in that same magazine volume could be 
plagiarised?



Paola



________________________________

From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> on behalf of Marko Hyvonen 
<[email protected]>
Sent: 03 June 2026 12:14
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic question: apparent verbatim plagiarism



⚠ External sender. Take care when opening links or attachments. Do not provide 
your login details.

Dear Marian,



Sorry to hear this has happened. A shocking case of plagiarism, even the fact 
that they left the original corresponding authors details there. I suspect you 
will not get reply from the journal.  Having a statement “All manuscripts are 
checked for plagiarism and ethical compliance.” on their website and publishing 
a verbatim copy of a paper is hardly reassuring of their processes.



I would, in this order:

Contact the “new” authors, both to ask if they know about this and, if not, to 
alert them in case it was done without them knowing. I suspect they have not 
done this but perhaps journal itself to boost its impact factor and traffic to 
site.

I would also contact J Med Chem Editor-in-chief to let them know about this – 
they might offer advice as this is probably not the first time they see this 
and affects them too.

If it seems that the “new” authors are responsible, contact their host 
institutions’ offices of research integrity. I know University of São Paulo has 
one, suspect UFRJ and UNICAMP have too.

Write a note on PubPeer portal https://pubpeer.com/ , but only if do not get 
any traction otherwise, especially as you might name and shame innocent parties 
inadvertently with that.



Best, Marko



From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Marian Oliva
Sent: 03 June 2026 11:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ccp4bb] Off topic question: apparent verbatim plagiarism



Dear CCP4 colleagues,

I would like to bring to your attention a very unusual and concerning case of 
apparent plagiarism and to seek advice from the community on how best to 
proceed.

Recently, we discovered that an article we originally published in 2020 in the 
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00855) appears to 
have been republished in the Journal of Research in Health Sciences under a 
different title and with a completely different list of authors (DOI: 
10.31472/JRHS.2024.2.3<https://jrhsjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/Vol16I2-3.pdf>)
 in 2024 (https://jrhsjournal.com/volume-16-issue-2-2024/)

What is particularly striking is that the overlap is not limited to concepts, 
text fragments, or results. The manuscript appears to reproduce, essentially 
verbatim the main text, paragraph by paragraph; the figures, reproduced 
identically; the figure legends; the experimental descriptions; the 
acknowledgements section and; even the name of the original corresponding 
author remains present in the text.

In other words, apart from the title and author list, the article appears to be 
an exact copy of the original publication.

We have already contacted the Editor of the Journal of Research in Health 
Sciences and provided documentation of the overlap. However, we have not yet 
received a response.

In an attempt to understand what may have happened, I searched for the listed 
authors. Most appear to have ResearchGate profiles and publication records. 
Interestingly, the allegedly plagiarized paper does not appear among their 
listed publications, and none of the authors seem to have a research background 
related to the scientific field of the original work. This raises the 
possibility that the listed authors may themselves be unaware of the 
publication.

The journal itself appears to be indexed in Medline and has been present in 
PubMed for several years, making the situation even more surprising.

I would therefore be grateful for any advice from colleagues who may have 
encountered similar situations. In particular:

- What additional steps would you recommend beyond contacting the journal 
editor? Should the matter be reported to PubMed/Medline or other indexing 
services at this stage?

- Are there organizations or formal procedures that have proven effective in 
obtaining investigations and retractions in comparable cases?

Any guidance or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you very much for your time and advice.

Best regards,

Marian

Marian Oliva

Unit for Biological, Immunological, and Chemical Drug Development

Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas

CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS

+34 918669485

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

C/ Ramiro de Maeztu, 9. 28040-Madrid



**NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD** Este correo electrónico, y en su caso los ficheros 
adjuntos, pueden contener información protegida para el uso exclusivo de su 
destinatario. Se prohíbe la distribución, reproducción o cualquier otro tipo de 
transmisión por parte de otra persona que no sea el destinatario. Si usted 
recibe por error este correo, se ruega comunicarlo al remitente y borrar el 
mensaje recibido.

**CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This email communication and any attachments may 
contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the 
designated recipient named above. Distribution, reproduction or any other use 
of this transmission by any party other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and 
delete all copies.











________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to