> On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:54 , tony duell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, 'there's not the time to do it properly, but there is the time to do it 
> again'.
> 
> Why not do it properly first time? What is the rush in bringing up a classic 
> computer?

Sorry for yet another reply, but I didn't think of this until just now: When I 
was working on getting tu58em functioning with my 730's console code a couple 
weeks ago, a few folks recommended that I build an Arduino-based emulator that 
has been known to work well. But I didn't, because I didn't have that 
particular kind of Arduino board on hand, and I wanted to get it working that 
weekend instead of the next one. And I did. :P

> 'Full stock of TTL parts' ??? You make it sound like I am suggesting using 
> lookahead carry generators,
> parallel multipliers, Excess 3 to 1-of-n decoders and the like (all of which 
> exist(ed) in TTL). No, I am suggesting
> using some very common counter and gate ICs.
> 
> How are you going to fix a TTL-based machine like your 11/730 without spares 
> and without knowing
> what the ICs do?

The same way I got my HMMWV running back in 2000. I had quite a bit of parts 
and tools on hand already from my previous work on my M543A2, and plenty of 
manuals to study. Some things I fixed with what I already had on hand. And when 
I found that the injection pump needed rebuilding, I took out the pump and 
brought it to a local Stanadyne shop. And I ordered a replacement radius rod 
end after I determined I needed it, not before. I had a lot of 1/4"-20 grade 8 
hardware in my junk box already for misc. mechanical repairs, but I still had 
to order some more for sizes I hadn't encountered before.

Back on the 730, I don't have most of the parts you mentioned on hand already 
because I've only gotten into retrocomputing within the last 2 years, and I've 
spend most of the last 30 years keeping with the times. Hint: I haven't 
designed a through-hole board at work since the early 1990s, and I didn't use 
perfboard the last time I built a GPS receiver the size of my pinky fingernail 
(not an exaggeration). ;)


-- 
Mark J. Blair, NF6X <[email protected]>
http://www.nf6x.net/

Reply via email to