In a message dated 7/2/2015 5:14:33 P.M. MT, [email protected] writes:
I have  been using Mosaic on my OpenVMS system, almost unusable, but fun.

In what way is it "unusable"?

It's more  important in this day and age to keep up with the web publishing
standards  than maintain backward compatibility.

Is FORM that much more important than CONTENT?
WHY "keep up with the web publishing standards"??!?
What does that mean?
Just because somebody comes up with an even flashier way to have dancing kangaroos and yodelling jellyfish present your message doesn't necessarily mean that anything previous is "UNACCEPTABLE". In most cases, maintaining backwards compatability merely means telling the "web development" software and/or staff to NOT flip the "exclude everything non-current" switch. 'Course most "web development" software from MICROS~1 prob'ly has default settings of "block access by any versions prior to this one".

Google penalizes sites that are  not mobile friendly in their rankings.

Yes, it surely is far more important that a site be easy to use on a telephone than its content! Format should follow readability guidelines for a first grade primer, with preferably no more than 6 lines of text on the screen at a time, with no more than 6 words of text per line. Or, if that's too insulting, follow the "Haiku rule of formatting" and don't exceed 17 syllables. (cf, "The Cognitive Style Of PowerPoint : Pitching Out Corrupts Within" by Edward R. Tufte)

30+ years ago, there were actually some serious studies analyzing correlations in writing styles with number of characters on the screen. Would Herman Melville have benefitted from the use of a word processor with a small screen?

Does it really make sense that non-telephone software be prioritized by the ease of use of the website by a telephone?
Certain software thay I've written will not run on a telephone;
why should the websites providing information about it?

I get an amazing amount of spam, even from Network Solutions (remember what THEIR role in internet used to be?), about the "necessity" of being ranked first. Much of which is presumably selling stuff to scam the Google ranking systems, such as by flooding the site with invisible high-value terms.


If you can't be found, what's  the point?

Is the only possible point to putting a document on the web being to attract strangers to a site? Is it ALL advertising? Is there "no point" to having a document available on the web for access by people who have been notified about its existence in any form other than Google search? Yeah, it is nice if people looking for your content can find it more easily, but what's with the over-emphasis on being found ahead of anybody else's content?

If somebody is looking for me, or any of my projects, they are easy to find. Should I also rename myself "Aaaaaaa" just so I can be the first one in the phonebook?
My websites tend to be "best viewed with Lynx 2.0",
although I often use IE 8.


--
Grumpy Ol' Fred                 [email protected]

Reply via email to