> On Jul 3, 2015, at 7:59 PM, Johnny Billquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > I find it hard to believe it was a plain 68K in there. That CPU have some > serious issues that makes it close to impossible to implement virtual memory > or proper usermode protection.
True, but Apollo did it anyway. I heard a rumor they used two 68k chips, one
running one cycle behind the other. Don’t know if that’s true. Needless to
say, as soon as the 68010 (or 68008?) showed up they switched.
paul
