On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:04 AM, N0body H0me <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyways, just trying to be helpful.
I appreciate that. I wasn't criticizing, just explaining a few reasons why I prefer not to use an actual 8289 in my design. Thanks! Eric
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:04 AM, N0body H0me <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyways, just trying to be helpful.
I appreciate that. I wasn't criticizing, just explaining a few reasons why I prefer not to use an actual 8289 in my design. Thanks! Eric