On Aug 21, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > > In fact, the clear copyright issue was apparently why IBM chose to ALSO sell > CP/M-86. However, there are disagreements about whether the pricing choice > was an IBM effort to sabotage the CP/M-86 sales, or a serious error by DRI. > (I believe the latter) >
The way I've heard the story before, was that Kildall was surprised when he finally saw the price sheet for the pricing of CP/M-86 vs PC-DOS. I guess we can either interpret that as he priced it too high and had no idea what MS were charging for PC-DOS, or that IBM deliberately priced them out of the market.
