On 11/9/2015 3:42 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jay Jaeger <cu...@charter.net> wrote: > >> On 11/8/2015 11:50 AM, Josh Dersch wrote: >> >>> >>> Anyone have any experience with this particular diagnostic? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Josh >>> >> >> The version can normally be identified either by the file name or on the >> paper tape if you are using a real paper tape. My guess is that the >> version you are running does not match the PDF. >> >> Some of us also have diagnostic listings of various versions, and have >> some of them on Microfiche. Unfortunately, I do not seem to have a >> listing for DZQKC (any revision). [It isn't missing - it isn't even >> listed in the fiche index. :( ] >> >> HOWEVER, I *DO* have a *paper* listing of revision E (among others). >> The code starting at 16002 reads >> >> 016002 105737 177564 TSTB @#TPS >> 016006 100375 BPL .-4 >> 016010 006237 177564 TSTB @#TPS >> 016014 000001 WAIT ; WAIT FOR FIRST INTERRUPT >> >> The routine starts at 015734 and the comment is ";CHECK TTY INTERRUPT" >> >> AND, the paper copy has a red stamp indicating that a change may be >> required for it to operation. >> >> LOC FROM TO >> 2266 200 340 >> 14146 200 340 >> 16164 5227 4737 >> 16166 0 160 >> >> 160 - 5227 >> 162 - 0 >> 164 - 1375 >> 166 - 207 >> >> So, please provide either the complete file name you loaded (if you are >> loading from RX, hard disk, DECTape, etc., or the complete information >> on the paper tape and we should at least be able to help you figure out >> if they match, or not, and whether or not someone has a listing that >> matches and can tell you what the error might mean, and perhaps provide >> a scan to you (and bitsavers). >> > > Thanks, I should have thought to check the revision codes in the first > place. Looks like the Bitsavers docs are from revision C; I've been > running the paper-tape version that's on Bitsavers ( > http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/bits/DEC/pdp11/papertapeimages/20031230/tray4.txt), > which is labeled as "maindec-11-dzqkc-e-pb" which looks like it should be > Revision E (which is fortunate!). > > If you do have the ability to scan this, I'd love to see it. > > Thanks, > Josh > > > >> >> JRJ >> >> >> >
The diagnostic listing is now available in my new bitsavers-contrib folder on Google drive: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B2v4WRwISEQRWWFFdVpCZWFTZEU&usp=sharing This is the only document in there right now, and you will find it in the same path that the other occupies on bitsavers, i.e. in folder ./pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/diag_listings A PDF is there as well as a zip file containing the original .tif files as Al Kossow prefers for submissions. (Al: Hint, Hint ;) ). JRJ