On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:09:45PM +0000, Rod Smallwood wrote: > So I'll put it down here.
Thank you!! > Hang on a mo if you do that you have to read all the messages backwards. No, you don't. If the text from the message one is replying to is properly trimmed, leaving just enough context for the reply to make sense it's very easy to follow. There's no reading backwards or jumping around required. Combine that with a mail client that can properly thread messages and even high volume mailing lists are easy to follow. Well, aside from posters who break threads when they reply. I think that mainly happens when some folks reply to digest e-mails instead of replying to the original message. On high volume lists I usually ignore such replies, unless it's a really interesting topic. -- Kevin http://www.RawFedDogs.net http://www.Lassie.xyz http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org Bruceville, TX What's the definition of a legacy system? One that works! Errare humanum est, ignoscere caninum.
