> On Apr 27, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Swift Griggs <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Zane Healy wrote: >> Don?t fret, once OpenVMS v9.0 is released, on x86-64, there won?t be any >> doubt as to who won. :-) > > :-) Well, in the spirit of further non-participation let me (a die hard > unix zealot) say that I can't wait to see VMS ported to x86-64. I think > VMS is cool. I've been learning about it lately. It has some great > features.
I’ve used both for a long time, but UNIX a bit longer. > Oh, and while I?m at it, both vi and emacs suck. Give me TPU! :-) > > Heh, I'm one of the few Unix guys that might be inclined to agree. I can > use both. However, I got used to Wordstar, then the IDE in Borland > products (which is similar to Wordstar). So, my favorite editor is "joe" > not Vi or Emacs, but TEHO. For me, using an editor is about familiarity, > even if something takes more keystrokes etc... I find it odd that people > actually argue about editors, but that's just a difference in value > system. Okay, I’m impressed! Someone that not only knows about my favorite UNIX text editor, but uses it! The first tool I install on any UNIX system, if it doesn’t have it, is ‘joe’. :-) Zane
