On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Paul Koning <paulkon...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > On Oct 3, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Pete Turnbull <p...@dunnington.plus.com> > wrote: > > > > ... > > I agree with Paul. I've seen dozens of RT-11 systems and non-parity MOS > memory has been more common in the ones I've seen. I see no reason to > think it would be a problem. True, 16K is small even for RT-11, but I've > seen plenty like that too. > > 16 kwords? That's at least 2x the minimum for older versions. I did my > honors work in college on an 11/20 with 8 kW... which was big enough not > just for RT11, but for RT-BASIC and some reasonable sized applications. > > paul > > > fine. I am not going to win. Is it *possible* yes...Hoping you can take the spirit of my original comments - this is not a beefed up 11/35 is all I am trying to say. If you want to run some old copy of RT 11 on this machine by all means do it.