> On Dec 9, 2016, at 3:39 PM, william degnan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Paul Koning <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> ...
>>
>> That's true, but the wording implies that the converse holds (360/75
>> programs will run on 360/44) which is usually not true. "Compatible subset
>> of the ... models" would be clearer.
>>
> Just like any older / newer computer that is in principle compatible, but
> practically not really.
Not quite. In the case of the 360/44, it wasn't compatible in principle
either, not even close and quite intentionally.
paul
