On 01/08/2017 04:42 PM, william degnan wrote: > Inverse 8085? I don't think so. If it helps, here's the first few lines of the "directory":
000: 00 a1 7a c1 c0 00 00 0007: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 1a 02 38 00 0013: a1 7a c1 c0 00 00 00 00 1b ff 00 00 001f: 5c 25 15 1b 4c 40 00 00 ff ff 37 05 002b: 94 2f 38 40 00 00 00 00 ff 8f 31 01 0037: c4 a3 75 6a ab 52 00 00 ff 85 25 05 0043: 94 2f 38 40 00 00 00 00 ff 02 0f 02 004f: c4 a3 75 6a ab 52 00 00 ff b6 09 04 005b: 94 2f 38 40 00 00 00 00 ff 03 02 03 0067: c4 a3 75 6a ab 52 00 00 ff 01 12 01 0073: d0 7f 9f 12 1f bd 53 28 ff ff 7f 02 007f: c4 a3 75 6a ab 52 00 00 ff 01 2b 00 008b: c4 a3 75 6a ab 52 00 00 ff 83 28 04 0097: c4 a3 75 6a ab 52 00 00 ff 01 38 00 00a3: 94 2f 3e 80 00 00 00 00 ff 01 1d 00 00af: 94 2f 4b 00 00 00 00 00 ff 03 35 05 00bb: 94 2f 4b 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff 3e 06 ... There are no other tables on disk. The disk itself is hard-sectored, with a sector length of 150 bytes and 16 sectors per track. They're interleaved 3:1 and grouped into blocks of 1200 bytes. The directory would correspond to block 0 and there are 72 entries in it, less the header. I can get the raw text, but how it's linked together and what file names might is still a mystery. --Chuck
