If it is your only scope I recommend an analog scope of at least 100 MHz, with dual trace and delayed sweep.
If you already have an analog scope, I recommend a logic analyzer instead of a digital scope. If you already have both above, I recommend a digital scope. Dwight ________________________________ From: cctech <cctech-boun...@classiccmp.org> on behalf of Michael Thompson via cctech <cct...@classiccmp.org> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 4:15:33 PM To: allison Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Subject: Re: Oscilloscope Recommendation Thanks for the recommendation Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 29, 2017, at 4:30 PM, allison <allisonporta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 04/29/2017 01:28 PM, Michael Thompson via cctech wrote: >> The RICM just received $1,000 to buy a new oscilloscope. I would like a >> four channel. and color would also be nice. The bandwidth doesn't need to >> be high because we usually work on ancient equipment. >> >> What would you suggest? >> > I use a RIgol DSO at work to replace a 200mhz Tek with power issues. Far > better scope. > For the money we paid, 4 channels and wide band its very decent. Being able > to get > screen grabs to a USB stick is a big plus. > > I personally have a Rigol DS815T spec analyser with tracking generator and > its a good performer. > Not up to the standards of a R&S FSH6 but about 1/15th the price. > > > Allison
