Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: >As an RTS? Wow, that's doing it the hard way. In either RT or RSX >emulation it would be easier, you have a friendlier development >environment that way. I've done an application as an RTS in the long-ago >past (an implementation of QUBIC, 3D 4x4x4x tic-tac-toe for a classmate) >but that was on V5B, where an RTS was the only way to do assembly >programming on RSTS.
This was for the command-line interface, which I needed to be absolutely, totally, seriously ^C and ^^C proof if I was going to let random outsiders dial up my RSTS machine. It worked nicely ... John Wilson D Bit