On 2018-01-02 3:00 PM, David Bridgham via cctalk wrote: > On 01/02/2018 02:05 PM, Toby Thain via cctalk wrote: > >>> Oh, I hadn't thought of Toby possibly meaning that. Yeah, I'm unlikely >>> to write up much documentation on the internals of the QSIC for people >>> who want to add other devices. However, not only will the source be >> Yes, that's what I meant. In fact I thought that was the point of the >> device :) > > Well, I guess I thought the point was to produce a working replacement > for the disk drives that are nearly unobtainable but if it turns out > that lots of people are seriously interested in developing for the QSIC > itself, then I'll have to revisit that supposition. In that case, I'd > probably write up more internals documentation than I would otherwise. > >> Hope so. And there's always the blog? > > Blog? Is there a blog about the QSIC that I don't know about? I'm not > much of a blogger but if you get me started talking about things that > interest me I tend to rattle on to excess. > >
Err.. could be my mistake... I meant wherever you posted your last technical note about QBus quirks. (I didn't look up the reference) --Toby
