Even though the 730 is also pretty slow, I would love to have one if anyone in the UK has one going spare....
Regards Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zane Healy > via cctalk > Sent: 13 August 2018 18:39 > To: Jon Elson <[email protected]>; General Discussion: On-Topic and > Off-Topic Posts <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: MicroVAX I > > > > On Aug 13, 2018, at 9:12 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On 08/12/2018 10:36 PM, robertbeauchamp33--- via cctalk wrote: > >> My mother is moving and her spouse has a MicroVax I he bought new > back in 1984 for some crazy amount. I don’t see this model listed in your > chart? Can you tell me if there is any value to this machine? He also has two > original monitors. > >> > >> > > Wow, relatively rare. Other than historical interest, there's pretty much > > no > "value" in it. It was a performance DOG. > > > > Jon > > The VAX-11/725 and VAX-11/730 is equally bad performance wise. A > MicroVAX I is 0.3 VUPS, and a MicroVAX II is 0.9 VUPS. > > http://www.people.vcu.edu/~agnew/MVAX/VAX-PERF.HTML > > Zane
