On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 13:11, Geoffrey Oltmans <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’ll throw in my two cents to say that I’ve used a fair number of GUIs over > the years both commercially available and FOSS, and I’d say that Windows 95’s > UI blew the doors off of anything I’d used up that point in terms of > usability. Nobody IMO can fairly compare it with the previously available X > based desktops. The Mac was good, the Amiga was good, but there was a lot > more flexibility in how Win95 operated, and that’s probably why (along with > familiarity) that it has been so oft copied up to this point (Mac OS X’s UI > notwithstanding, which is also quite good).
I'd go with that, actually, yes. My personal favourite in recent years was Ubuntu's Unity, which is a better Mac OS X than Mac OS X (IMHO). But the fact that I like it and am comfy with it doesn't mean that I don't want to see people trying to do something different... -- Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven Email: [email protected] - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: [email protected] Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven UK: +44 7939-087884 - ČR (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
