The 120 also used a 34010 to handle the graphics, I think? It has been a long time...
-- Will On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:51 PM Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk <[email protected]> wrote: > > If I recall correctly the Xstation 120 (the first of them) used an 8086 > (might have been an 80186). The big issue was that you couldn’t do anything > with it because what was in ROM/FLASH was only smart enough to be able to > TFTP the rest of the microcode (not terribly useful if you don’t have the > image it wants to TFTP). > > I think the 140 fixed that (and is somewhat telling from all of the Intel > flash parts on the board). But I don’t know what CPU it’s using. The IBM > metal can is probably the graphics controller. > > TTFN - Guy > > > > On Nov 1, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Wondering if this is an IBM Xstation 140 with token ring > > > > Wonder what processor it uses.. > > > > https://www.ebay.com/itm/273538296972 > > >
