simlar chain for me On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:29 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. > I replied to the spam, as shown below, although I switched it from cctech > to cctalk. > You replied to me, saying subscribers weren't moderated. I got that. > I replied to you, questioning whether hempoil was subscribed. > You replied to that. I got that. > AND, you replied to the one from Michael Mulhern: > Other than your reply to Michael Mulhern's message, I never > received the post from Michael Mulhern that you were replying to: > > So, my count is: > 1) Hempoil spam > 2) my reply > 3) your reply to me > 4) my reply to you > 5) your reply to me > I NEVER GOT Michael Mulhern's post. > 7?) your reply to Micheal Mulhern I got THAT, but not Michael Mulhern's > post that you were replying to. > 8) Bill Gunshannon's reply to you > > On 12/8/18 4:43 PM, Michael Mulhern wrote: > > We are the spambot challenge? > Something like that. > > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > > > On 12/8/18 6:44 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: > >> And, other than the mention of it by Grant, I never got Michael > >> Mulhern's message. > > > > Um … Fred, I replied to your email, which was itself a reply to the > > spam message. > > > > On 12/8/18 3:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: > >> WOW! > >> > >> That is the first TRULY obviously and unarguably spam post that I've > >> seen make it past the cctech moderation! > > > > > > > > -- > > Grant. . . . > > unix || die >
