On Sat, Mar 16, 2019, 8:09 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/16/19 9:48 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2019, 7:19 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > ------------ > > Hunk #11 succeeded at 1075. > > Hunk #12 succeeded at 1250. > > Overdue "---" at line 782--check line numbers at line 773. > > ----------- > > > > > > Has no one else noticed that a number of these patches fail? I am > > continuing to apply them and just hoping that I don't run into a > > point where one of the failures brings them all to a screeching > > halt. > > > > > > A number of them require manual shell commands before applying, which > > makes the process harder than you'd expect. > > > > Doesn't say anything about that in the accompanying text, either. > The patches were sent out by email with instructions on how to apply them. This went on for years by different people so that process wasn't uniform. I ran into this when I wanted to quickly create a bad 2.11github repo... I thought it would be quick, but quickly turned into a pita. Warner >
