On 7/21/2019 4:16 AM, Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk wrote:
I'd suggest that in 2019 when bits are cheap and high-quality scanners nearly as cheap, "crappy quality digital image" is a bit of a straw man. Yes, I've seen plenty of barely-readable or practically unreadable scans, but they were made years or decades ago.What dpi qualifies as not "crappy"? 300dpi? 400? 600?
It is not the DPI that is problem on some scans, but they used a LOSSY format to store the data. JPEG IS NO! Ben.
