On 11/22/19 1:01 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>
>> On Nov 21, 2019, at 10:13 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I *think* (and this is putting the wayback hat on) that the RH11 originally 
>> was the controller for the RS03 and RS04 fixed head disk drives. The dual 
>> Unibus was so you could put them on Unibus A for talking to the 11/45's main 
>> bus with data transfers ripping across Unibus B directly to the dual-ported 
>> memory on the 45.
>>
>> Thus one of the Unibus ports didn't need to worry about arbitration (it was 
>> the only thing on the bus) and could stream data from the (very quick) 
>> RS03/04's right into memory for the ultimate swap device.
> Nice swap device, certainly.  But the RS04 isn't actually all that fast.  The 
> book says 4 microseconds per word, compare that with the RP04 at 2.5 
> microseconds per word.  I remember we got an RP04 on our college 11/45 in 
> 1974 or early 1975, but that one still had an RF11 swapping disk.  So it's 
> not clear to me which came first.
But being a fixed head drive, the RS04 has no seek latency, so probably faster 
overall than a moving
head drive.

We had an RS04 swap device on our 11/70 at Purdue Electrical Engineering 
Network running BSD Unix.
It had been running for so long that the disk/head lubricant had worn away. If 
it was ever spun
down, it would have to be hand spun to overcome the initial friction, but then 
it was fine.

--tom
>> The 2020 takes advanatge of this with the dual unibus adapter, one talks to 
>> the chatty stuff like the DZ11's, the other has no arbitration issues as it 
>> sucks data down from the faster spinning RM03s without timeouts.
> RH11 machines could use the RM02 but not RM03; that one was supported only on 
> the 11/70 because of its speed.  But it's way faster than these other disks 
> we mentioned.  And then there was the RP07, which was never officially 
> supported on any PDP11 even though it did work fine on an 11/70; it was the 
> "super large" disk on the main RSTS/E development system.
>
>> One of my long term questions has been to see if a 2020 could talk to a 
>> RM80. It should be possible as the Massbus personality module talks to the 
>> bus at 3600 RPM just like the RM03, and they did manage to get the R80 to 
>> talk to the 11/730 with a dedicated memory channel connection (though maybe 
>> the R80 was heavily interleaved)
> If it can handle an RM03, then I'd expect an RM80 should work also since it 
> transfers at the same speed.
>
>       paul
>
>

Reply via email to